Cost Segregation Updated July 26, 2026 · 8 min read

See a real cost segregation report, page by page

Most providers will not show you a report until after you have paid. Here is a real one, for a $727,500 rental house, with the actual pages and the actual numbers.

Matthew Gigantelli

Matthew Gigantelli

Lead Cost Segregation Engineer · ASCSP Member M009-25

Buying a cost segregation study is a strange purchase. You pay a few thousand dollars for a document you have never seen, from a firm whose work you cannot inspect, to support a deduction you will carry for years. Almost nobody in this industry shows you the product first.

So here is ours. Everything below comes from a completed study on a single-family rental house: a real property, real measurements, real published cost data, and the real result. The owner's name, the street address, and the property photographs have been removed, and the report is shown as excerpts rather than a downloadable file. Everything you need in order to judge the quality of the work is here.

The short version

First-year depreciation with the study
$150,939.67
Without the study
$9,689.38
Depreciation moved into year one
$141,250.29
Study fee, and payback
$1,600 · 32.7x

A $727,500 house, purchased and placed in service in April 2026. Depreciation is a timing benefit rather than free money, and it only turns into cash if you have income the deduction is allowed to offset. Your own result will differ, so talk it through with your tax preparer.

What you are looking at

The property is an ordinary rental house, not a trophy asset. That is deliberate. It is the kind of property most people actually own.

Property typeStandalone single-family rental
Building size2,329 square feet, built 2006
Purchase price$727,500
Land value, which never depreciates$224,970
Depreciable basis$532,676.35
Study typePurchase price allocation, detailed engineering
Components identified125 line items
Report length64 pages

Land never depreciates, which is why the $224,970 comes off the top before anything else happens. Every number in this study works from the $532,676.35 that is left.

The page that matters most

If you read only one page of a cost segregation report, read this one. It compares the depreciation you can claim with the study against what you would have claimed without it, applies a tax rate, and divides by the fee. Every figure on it should be traceable to the detail later in the document.

Highlights page from a real cost segregation report showing $150,939.67 of depreciation with cost segregation versus $9,689.38 without it, and a 32.7 to 1 payback ratio
The highlights page. Note that it states the fee and the payback openly, not only the savings.

The 37% tax rate here is an illustration, not a promise. Your benefit depends on your bracket and on how much income the deduction is permitted to offset, which is a conversation for your tax preparer. A report that presents a savings figure without naming the assumption behind it is selling rather than reporting.

Where the money actually moved

Cost segregation does not invent a deduction. It moves parts of the building out of the slow 39-year category into faster 5-year and 15-year categories, because those parts genuinely wear out sooner. Carpet is not a structural wall. A driveway is not a roof.

Reallocation page showing 17.06 percent of basis assigned to 5-year property, 9.95 percent to 15-year land improvements, and 72.99 percent remaining in 39-year property
About 27% of the basis was accelerated. Nearly three quarters of it stayed where it was.
Recovery period What lives here Amount Share
5 yearFlooring, cabinets, appliances, trim, dedicated wiring$90,874.2417.06%
15 yearPaving, patio, landscaping, site work$52,992.999.95%
39 yearStructure, framing, roof, masonry, mechanical systems$388,809.1172.99%
Total$532,676.35100%

That 27% is worth remembering as a sanity check. If a provider tells you they can accelerate 50% or 60% of an ordinary rental house, ask which components and on what authority. Aggressive numbers are easy to promise and hard to defend years later.

Every dollar ties back to a building system

This is the page that separates an engineering study from a spreadsheet estimate. Costs are organized by construction division, so the totals are not merely asserted. They are built up from named parts of the house and then checked back against the depreciable basis.

Allocation table showing costs distributed across concrete, masonry, finishes, plumbing, electrical and exterior improvements, totaling $532,676
Costs by construction division, reconciling to the $532,676 basis.

Behind that summary sits the detail: 125 individual line items, each with a quantity, a unit, a unit cost from published construction cost data, and an assigned recovery period. Here are ten of the largest, to show the level the work is done at.

Component Quantity Unit cost Allocated Life
Asphalt paving, on base7,274 sq ft$3.99$24,769.1315 yr
Hardwood plank flooring1,039 sq ft$14.95$13,256.275 yr
Site preparation and improvements21,500 sq ft$0.47$8,623.8415 yr
Hardwood ceiling trim and molding1,020 lin ft$9.71$8,452.485 yr
Flagstone paving400 sq ft$22.02$7,516.9515 yr
Water filtration system1 each$8,075.00$7,035.585 yr
Kitchen base cabinets32 lin ft$250.00$6,827.395 yr
Carpet, medium grade775 sq ft$6.20$4,100.705 yr
Sodded lawn3,000 sq ft$1.33$3,405.1615 yr
Concrete patio446 sq ft$8.45$3,216.3015 yr

Ten of the 125 line items in this study, chosen to show the range. "Allocated" is the amount after reconciliation to the property's actual basis, which is why it does not equal quantity times unit cost.

That gap is worth understanding, because it is where thin studies go wrong. Published cost data tells you what a component costs to build new today. A real study then adjusts for the local market, adjusts again for the age and condition of the building, and finally reconciles the whole schedule back to what the buyer actually paid. Skip that last step and you end up claiming more basis than the property has.

Who signed it

A report is a professional opinion, and an opinion needs an author. This one opens with a cover letter naming the engineer who prepared it, his credential, the scope of the work, and what the analysis relied on, above his signature.

Cover page of a Modern CFO cost segregation study showing the client, the property type, and the preparer with his ASCSP membership number
The cover page. Client details on this sample have been replaced with placeholders.

The IRS guidance its own examiners use looks for exactly this. A study signed by "the engineering department" gives an examiner nobody to ask questions of. A named preparer with a professional membership does, and that is a meaningful part of why a report holds up.

The rest of the 64 pages

The excerpts above are the parts worth showing. For completeness, here is what else is in the document and what each part is for.

Property photographs
Interior and exterior photographs tied to the components they document. This is the evidence file. If anyone asks why the landscaping was treated as a 15-year improvement, the photographs show what was measured. Not shown here, because they would identify the owner's home.
Replacement cost detail and reconciliation
The full arithmetic behind every line item: quantity, published unit cost, adjustment for location, adjustment for age and condition, then the reconciliation back to the actual purchase basis. Roughly 17 pages.
Depreciation schedules
Year-by-year depreciation for every asset, from 2026 through the end of its life. This is the part your tax preparer works from. Each row records the depreciation system, method, convention, and bonus rate applied.
Methodology, authorities, and definitions
How components were identified and classified, the basis for treating an item as personal property rather than part of the building, definitions of each recovery class, and a glossary. This is the section an examiner reads first.
Limiting conditions, disclosure, and certification
What the study does and does not claim, the required professional disclosures, and the signed certification.

How to judge any report, including ours

You do not need to be an engineer to tell a real study from a thin one. Five checks cover most of it.

1
A person signed it. A named preparer with a credential, not a company name or a department.
2
Your property is in it. Photographs of your building and measurements of your rooms, not stock images and generic assumptions.
3
Line items, not percentages. Individual components with quantities and unit costs. If the report says "22% of basis" with no schedule underneath, there is nothing there to defend.
4
The unit costs come from somewhere. Published construction cost data, such as RS Means or Marshall and Swift, cited in the report and adjusted for your location and your building's age.
5
It reconciles. The line items add up to the depreciable basis. Ask for the total and check it against your purchase price less land.

The study on this page passes all five, which is the only reason it is worth showing you. Our fees run from $1,200 to $12,000 depending on the property, and every study is prepared and signed by a cost segregation engineer. The one above was $1,600.

Want to see what your property would produce?

Enter your address and you will get an estimated benefit range in about a minute, then a flat-fee quote before any work begins. No cost and no obligation.

Get my free analysis

This article is general information, not tax advice. Depreciation is a timing benefit, part of it can be recaptured when you sell, and whether a deduction reduces your tax in a given year depends on your own circumstances. Please review any study with your tax preparer.

See Your Property's Cost Segregation Savings

Enter your property address for an instant, free estimate. Results in 60 seconds, all assumptions editable.

No email required Instant results All assumptions editable 1,000+ studies completed

Prefer to talk to an expert? Schedule a free consultation